.
Feedback

LASD Roundup: New Blach Principal & More

Los Altos School District's transition kindergarten, still a potential cut from the state budget, eschews a central school and opts for a child's 'home' school.

This week in Los Altos School District news, the got a tweak, a possible bond election to build a tenth campus was discussed, and the new principal at Blach School was introduced to the board.

Sandra McGonagle was introduced as the new principal at , Monday night, taking over from principal Leslie Crane, who gave her notice earlier this year. Crane spent more than a dozen years in the district and was principal of Blach since 2006. McGonagle is the current principal at . (Patch will have a Q&A with McGonagle on Monday.)

The district is proceeding with plans for a transitional kindergarten program but has changed plans for a central transitional kindergarten class, said Alyssa Gallagher, assistant superintendent of instruction. It is aimed at the children who turn five later in the year, and end up going into kindergarten before they may be ready. Children in California have been eligible to enroll in kindergarten if they turned 5 by December 2. A 2010 "school readiness" law sponsored by state Sen. Joe Simitian gradually increases the age at which children become eligible for kindergarten, to Sept. 1 by 2014. It requires districts to offer an optional year of transitional kindergarten to children whose birthdays fall between the old and new dates. 

The program at LASD was initially going to have one transitional kindergarten class for all the district children at Almond School. With the possibility that the governor may cut the program, Gallagher suggested putting the children qualifying for the program at their home school instead of one central school. She said this would mean less change in a young child’s life.

Gallagher said she still needs to communicate with the appropriate staff and parents who signed up for traditional kindergarten regarding the change.

The board continued its examination of a potential bond measure in the fall, hearing from a finance consultant about considerations.

The district has a basic facilities needs that includes additional classroom space, the next step in modernization projects, improvements to fields, implementation of solar facilities, and more, according to Dave Olson, vice president of KNN Public Finance, the independent company advising the district about its possible bond election.

As such, the district would need to go to voters for a general bond measure election, which can only occur certain times in even-numbered years. The board has been looking at a November 2012 election and would need to decide by mid-August to get it on the ballot.

Scott Burke, a Covington School parent, addressed the board on a bond measure, particularly in the area of clear communication. “Getting more information to the community is in all of our interests." 

“...School size is important for those of us who chose to come to Los Altos. The more information you can give us to help carry that message out, the better chance there is in us supporting the bond.”

A copy of the finance consultant's presentation, and the original transitional kindergarten plans (central location) are attached to this article, above. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Joan J. Strong May 22, 2013 at 11:21 am
Corrections: 1. Straw man attack: nobody is blaming BCS for district-wide growth. Nobody. 2. BCSRead More does not get "half the funding" of LASD. BCS gets about 6500 and LASD gets about 9500. The BCS program for typical children costs about twice as much as the comparable LASD program. BCS is simple an expensive hybrid public/private school, nothing more. 3. Mr. Roode pointed out that there are about 100 or so special ed. students at LASD (I cannot verify this but it seems very low). LASD calls out an annual expense of $7.5 million for special ed. meaning each of these students cost LASD $75,000, not $1,000 as he implied. 4. The law and the courts have ALREADY compelled LASD to give reasonably equivalent facilities and they have. BCS has a lower student/teacher ratio meaning that they have more classrooms for the same number of kids. This is not, legally speaking, LASD's problem. 5. Mr. Roode has yet to explain how the Covington campus could be 16 acres. Further, he continues to spread the fallacy that campuses ACREAGE is even remotely relevant to its student capacity. Campuses are limited by their location and traffic, not how many acres of grass there is in the back. 6. Were it not for BCS, we would have passed a bond in the last election, as the polling shows. BCS litigation has ripped our community apart and has left it with a mountain to climb when it comes to operating in a normal fashion.
L.A. Chung (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
@David R. I think Homestead uses EarthCare Recycling, based on its April 6 E-Waste collection dayRead More publicity (http://bit.ly/10mIV14) : www.earthcarerecycling.com "Recycle FREE your old electronic equipment - working or not! Anything with a plug or PC board inside. Also accepted are non-household batteries, VHS tapes and other media, and scrap metal. Visit www.earthcarerecycling.com for a list of accepted items. "
David R. May 21, 2013 at 10:26 pm
What kind of bins are there? Do you take used CDROMs? How about VHS tapes? Cables and wire?
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.