.
Feedback

Republicans: Top-Two Primary System Hurts The GOP

In a Patch statewide survey of influential California Republicans, 40 percent feel Democrats will benefit from the system.

 

A large percentage of California Republican insiders believe the top-two primary system approved by voters in 2010 has hurt their party: That's the most notable finding of Patch's inaugural Red California survey of influential Republicans.

The 40 percent of Republicans who thought the top-two system hurt their party formed a plurality. Twenty-nine percent said the top-two primary system has helped the GOP and 31 percent said it has had no partisan effect.

"Because Democrats dominate politics in California that'll give them an advantage in the elections,” one respondent wrote. “So, I foresee that this will not resound well for the Republicans. Hope I'm wrong."

Another respondent said indecision under the new rules also hurt Republicans: "The Party could not make up its mind on how or whether to endorse candidates before the Primary. The result was weak candidates or no representation in some races."

Voters in 2010 approved Proposition 14, the Top Two Candidates Open Primary Act, and the primary election in June was the first statewide election conducted under the new rules. Under the new system, the top two overall vote-getters in the primary election will face each other in the Nov. 6 general election, regardless of their political party.

When asked if the top-two primary system would lead to more Republican candidates taking centrist positions between now and the general election, 54 percent of survey respondents said no and 46 percent said candidates would move toward the center.

"If they're smart they would, but who knows?" said Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a senior fellow at the University of Southern California's School of Policy, Planning and Development and longtime California political analyst who surveyed the results for Patch. "Republicans and Democrats both have to reach out beyond their party space. They have to reach out to 'no party preference' voters and third-party voters."

Proposition 14 has its roots in the 2009 budget battle between ex-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the state Legislature. The stalemate broke after state Sen. Abel Maldonado, a moderate Republican from Santa Maria, crossed the aisle and voted in favor of the budget and its tax increases in exchange for putting the top-two primary initiative on the ballot.

Proponents of the top-two system have said that its goal was to move both Republicans and Democrats toward the center to alleviate the polarization that has gridlocked Sacramento, Jeffe said.

"That was one of the major drivers of this initiative to make candidates reach out beyond the conservative party base among Republicans and the liberal party base among Democrats," she said.

It was interesting to note that a majority of Republicans said they didn't believe GOP candidates would move more to the center, Jeffe said.

"It may be true and they will probably learn a lesson from it," she said.

A majority of respondents, 53 percent, said they either disagreed or somewhat disagreed that Democrats would take a super-majority in the state Senate in the 2012 elections. 

Even if Democrats do take two-thirds control of the state Senate, it's unlikely they would get two-thirds control of the state Assembly, which means Republicans could still block any attempt to raise taxes, Jeffe said.

The Red California Survey

Our surveys are not a scientific random sample of any larger population, but rather an effort to listen to a swath of influential local Republican activists, party leaders and elected officials in California. All of these individuals have agreed to participate in surveys, although not all responded to this week's questions. The survey went out June 29 to July 9 and results reported July 10.

Patch will be conducting Red California and Blue California surveys throughout 2012 in hopes of determining the true sentiment of Republicans and Democrats on the ground in California. If you are an activist, party leader or elected official and would like to take part in a weekly surveys that lasts just a few minutes, please email Sandra Oshiro.

Red California Survey roster: Richard Adams (Studio City Neighborhood Council safety chief); Gary Aminoff (San Fernando Valley Republicans president); Michael Antonovich (Los Angeles County supervisor); Steve Baric (California Republican Party vice chair); Tony Beall (Rancho Santa Margarita City Council member); Susan Blau (Studio City political activist); Dion Bracco (Gilroy Council member, mayoral candidate); Sue Caro (County GOP chairwoman); Scott Carpenter (Orange County political blogger); Tamara Colbert (Tea Party member); John Colbert (Former Republican candidate for Congress); Dylan Conroy (Greater Toluca Lake Neighborhood Council representative); Irene DeBlasio (Republican activist); Steve Detrick (Elk Grove City Council member) Ben DiBenedetto (Studio City Neighborhood Council board member); Jane Diehl (Redondo Beach school board member); Chip Dykes (Oceanside City Council candidate); Laura Emdee (Redondo Beach school board member); Heidi Gallegos (Rowland Unified School District Board member); Andrew Gayner Carmichael (Patch blogger); Mike Gin (Redondo Beach mayor); Gil Gonzalez (State Senate candidate); David Hall (Mt. San Antonio College Board trustee); Alex Keledjian (La Canada Flintridge Young Republicans president); Ernest Koeppen (La Canada Flintridge resident); Becky Kolberg (Contra Costa GOP chair); Bob Kowell (Murrieta-Temecula Republican Assembly president); Greg Krikorian (State Assembly candidate); Jim Light (Slow-growth advocate); Patrice Lynes (Activist); Larry Masuoka (San Juan Unified School District Board member); Brad McGirr (Rancho Santa Margarita planning commissioner) Gina McNelley (Capistrano Valley Republican Women Federated member) Bridget Melson (East Bay Tea Party chair); Mark Meuser (State Senate candidate); Nathan Mintz (Former State Assembly candidate); Larry Molton (California GOP member); Roger Niello (Sacramento County Chamber of Commerce president); Gayle Pacheco (Republican Women Federated member); Chris Pareja (Congressional candidate); Al Phillips (State Assembly candidate); Jim Reardon (San Juan Capistrano resident); Al Restivo (Former La Canada Republicans Club president); Matt Rexroad (Yolo County supervisor); Scott Schmidt (Former LA Chapter Log Cabin Republicans president); Howard Schmidt (Chief of staff for Sacramento County supervisor); Nick Shih (Activist); Suzanne St. John (Activist); Mary Su (Walnut mayor); Gino Sund (Altadena Town Council member); Peter Tateishi (State Assembly candidate); Brad Torgan (LA Chapter Log Cabin Republicans president); Steve Vaus (City budget review committee member); Bob Walters (Former San Juan Unified School Board member); John Webb (Businessman).

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Joan J. Strong May 22, 2013 at 11:21 am
Corrections: 1. Straw man attack: nobody is blaming BCS for district-wide growth. Nobody. 2. BCSRead More does not get "half the funding" of LASD. BCS gets about 6500 and LASD gets about 9500. The BCS program for typical children costs about twice as much as the comparable LASD program. BCS is simple an expensive hybrid public/private school, nothing more. 3. Mr. Roode pointed out that there are about 100 or so special ed. students at LASD (I cannot verify this but it seems very low). LASD calls out an annual expense of $7.5 million for special ed. meaning each of these students cost LASD $75,000, not $1,000 as he implied. 4. The law and the courts have ALREADY compelled LASD to give reasonably equivalent facilities and they have. BCS has a lower student/teacher ratio meaning that they have more classrooms for the same number of kids. This is not, legally speaking, LASD's problem. 5. Mr. Roode has yet to explain how the Covington campus could be 16 acres. Further, he continues to spread the fallacy that campuses ACREAGE is even remotely relevant to its student capacity. Campuses are limited by their location and traffic, not how many acres of grass there is in the back. 6. Were it not for BCS, we would have passed a bond in the last election, as the polling shows. BCS litigation has ripped our community apart and has left it with a mountain to climb when it comes to operating in a normal fashion.
L.A. Chung (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
@David R. I think Homestead uses EarthCare Recycling, based on its April 6 E-Waste collection dayRead More publicity (http://bit.ly/10mIV14) : www.earthcarerecycling.com "Recycle FREE your old electronic equipment - working or not! Anything with a plug or PC board inside. Also accepted are non-household batteries, VHS tapes and other media, and scrap metal. Visit www.earthcarerecycling.com for a list of accepted items. "
David R. May 21, 2013 at 10:26 pm
What kind of bins are there? Do you take used CDROMs? How about VHS tapes? Cables and wire?
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.