.
Feedback

Quarry Road is Private, Supervisors Declare, But Courts May Decide Issue

Residents from Cupertino, Los Altos and Los Altos Hills plead with board to no avail on Tuesday morning.

Permanente Road, a former wagon trail winding up into the foothills above Cupertino and Los Altos, is private, for use by Lehigh Southwest Cement only, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday morning.

About 15 residents from Cupertino, Los Altos and Los Altos Hills implored the supervisors to either deny or postpone the request.

“The board is acting as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehigh,” accused Richard Adler, an opponent who is on the board of a citizen's group called BACE, when he addressed the supervisors.

The board’s unanimous vote Tuesday morning was expected by residents opposing the move, and because of supervisors' past decisions, most expressed cynicism that the current Board of Supervisors would ever listen to their requests for more regulation over Lehigh’s operations.

Lehigh officials, county planning staff, and a county attorney argued the road is, in effect, already private, under state definition.

But Stuart Flashman, attorney for Bay Area Clean Environment (BACE), made a case that by conducting Tuesday’s hearing, it is an admission by the county that the road is public, not private.

Permanente Road started as a wagon trail for various property owners living in the hills in the 19th century. A public easement was granted to the county in 1893, but the county never actually owned the land under the easement, according to staff.

At a later date the parcels were sold to one property owner, and in 1935 a gate was placed across the road. There appears to be no record of an official request to grant the easement back to a private landowner.

Lehigh officials argued on Tuesday that the road no longer meets state definitions for a public road because it is impassable to vehicular traffic and the county does not maintain the road. County staff also said that there is no intention to use the road as a public road in the future.

Opponents argued that the road, indeed, is passable—to heavy Lehigh vehicles—and could be used by the public once mining operations cease, possibly within 30 years.

Despite the supervisors' action, the issue is far from over.

BACE, formerly known as No Toxic Air, is , in part over the issue surrounding the road.

“This is still a live issue,” said BACE attorney Flashman, after the vote.

BACE's lawsuit specifically asks the court to declare the road public, as well as overturn the supervisor’s to Lehigh for its quarrying activities on the property. If Permanente Road was public, the company would have to follow certain mining regulations alongside the road.

The supervisors' February decision specifically recommended that Lehigh formally request that the public easement over the road be granted to the company when it made its decision in February. Tuesday’s hearing was the culmination of that request.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.