.
Feedback

President Obama Meets With Silicon Valley Leaders

At a private dinner meeting with Silicon Valley technology leaders, Obama discussed job growth, innovation and education in science, technology, engineering and math.

President Obama’s arrival in Silicon Valley Thursday evening marked more than his fourth visit to the region since his 2008 election; it demonstrated his commitment to work with companies such as Cupertino’s  to develop new jobs and innovative technology and increase exports.

At the private Woodside residence of venture capitalist John Doerr of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Obama met over dinner with Steve Jobs, chairman and CEO of Apple—who is on medical leave—and 11 other leaders of the region’s technology companies.

After Apple takes over Hewlett-Packard’s Cupertino campus and builds a new campus, the company is expected to bring upward of 3,000 new jobs to the city.

“In the president’s State of the Union address, he called on us to win the future by out-innovating and out-educating the rest of the world and increasing American competitiveness,” said White House press secretary Jay Carney, in a statement. "The president believes that American companies like these have been leading by investing in the creativity and ingenuity of the American people, creating cutting-edge new technologies and promoting new ways to communicate.”

Air Force One arrived at San Francisco Airport at 5:40 p.m. Thursday, where Obama was greeted by Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, state Attorney General Kamala Harris and San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee. After a brief greeting with a couple-dozen invited guests, Obama left in Marine One, headed for Cañada College.

Shortly after 6 p.m. Obama was taken to the home of Doerr and his wife, Ann, for a private dinner meeting with Jobs and other tech leaders. The White House press corps waited in the Doerr’s garage, according to an e-mail message from Sam Youngman of The Hill, who was among the press pool.

The tech-star line-up included Jobs; Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook; John Chambers, CEO of Cisco Systems; Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle; Reed Hastings, CEO of Netflix; Carol Bartz, CEO and president of Yahoo; Dick Costolo, CEO of Twitter; Art Levinson, chairman of Genentech; Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google; former California State Controller Steve Westly; and Stanford University President John Hennessy.

At the meeting, Obama “specifically discussed his proposals to invest in research and development and expand incentives for companies to grow and hire, along with his goal of doubling exports over five years to support millions of American jobs,” Carney added in his statement.           

Included were discussions around investments in education, specifically encouraging people to study and enter the science, technology, engineering and math fields, and the new White House initiative, Startup America, which is a “partnership with the private sector aimed at supporting new startups and small businesses.”

“The president expressed his desire to continue a dialogue with the group to share new ideas so we can work as partners to promote growth and create good jobs in the United States,” Carney said

Most of the guests belong to TechNet, an advocacy group founded by Doerr, Chambers and Jim Barksdale in 1997.

According to the TechNet website, the group is committed to "advancing public policies and private sector initiatives that make the U.S. the most innovative country in the world," a goal that was also noted by the president in his recent State of the Union address.

“I was honored to be part of the discussion with President Obama and Silicon Valley business leaders," Chambers said. "Government and private industry must work hand-in-hand to spur innovation, strengthen our economy and get Americans back to work.

"Our ongoing dialogue with the Administration gives us confidence that we can boost innovation and investment in America," he said.

Continuing his tech-visit route, Obama left San Francisco International Airport at 8:46 a.m. Friday, headed next to an Intel Corp. plant in Hillsboro, OR, to learn about the company's STEM, or Science, Technology, Engineering and Math, education programs.

—Bay City News Service contributed to this report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

mj February 18, 2011 at 09:43 pm
Why is Obama meeting with only the billionaires of silicon valley? what about the more average citizen who is struggling to survive the bad economic times and dealing with unemployment? Again, where are the jobs, Prez?
Elizabeth Stanley February 18, 2011 at 10:35 pm
was anyone from AOL there? lol! i agree w/ mj about the seeing everyone part. i know that it's those billionaires are important to our economy, but wouldn't have killed him to stop by a library or something & talk to the other 99% of us.
Sheila Sanchez (Editor) February 19, 2011 at 12:00 am
Hi Elizabeth, we don't have a Patch site in Woodside, where the dinner took place. We would have totally been there to cover it, though. We reported on the story to the best of our ability considering the event was private and closed to the media. Glad you're reading.
James February 20, 2011 at 02:30 am
"we don't have a Patch site in Woodside, where the dinner took place". Very funny!!
Claudia Cruz (Editor) February 20, 2011 at 03:34 am
Oh, James, I get it! Why wasn't AOL (not Patch) there ... We live in our own little Patchworld sometimes. Hmmm, Elizabeth, ask the White House:-)
L.A. Chung (Editor) February 20, 2011 at 03:33 pm
I'd imagine that with AOL being at Dulles, VA, that Tim Armstrong is a little closer to the White House than Silicon Valley, if his opinion were being sought.
Robert February 25, 2011 at 10:58 pm
Why did Obama meet only with the Silicon Valley billionaires? Obama plans on running a 1 billion dollar campaign for re-election in 2012. When politicians need that amount of money they go to the people who have the billions of dollars.
What do you need jobs for? In two years Obama and the Democrats have totally saved our country. Obama saved the country from the next depression. The recession is over. Unemployment is dropping like a rock and the stock market is sky rocketing. Obama Administration has saved or created over 3 million jobs. Green jobs are saving California with thousands of manufacturing jobs. The world loves America because of Obama and the world has never had such a period of sustained peace. Our troops are out of Iraq and Afghanistan and Gitmo is closed. America is safer than ever before and has not sustained a terrorist attack since 9-11. We are so lucky to have a leader like Obama! Obama in 2012!
Ann Krueger Spivack February 26, 2011 at 12:50 am
I believe Obama also meets with Americans at our income level, although not during this last California trip. If you go to whitehouse.gov and look at the photo galleries (which is where I got the photo in this article) you can see a fair number of pics of Obama meeting with ordinary folks. When we were in D.C. last year, while on a tour, we spoke to a security guard who said he had worked there for 26 years. He said this White House has more "regular Americans" meeting with the president than during any administration since he started working there. Granted this is anecdotal; I haven't researched it; I might research it to see if it's true.
But -- bigger question -- who would you like to see run in 2012?
Robert February 26, 2011 at 01:09 am
Hi Ms Spivack -
Obama of course - anyone else would be crazy to run against a man with that much power and money. What is wrong with you... n0 one could ever hope of changing the minds of his loving people. Cheers -
Ann Krueger Spivack February 26, 2011 at 12:40 pm
Dear Mr. Windisch,
Things aren't running smoothly in this country, we agree on that. We are all in the same (leaky) boat even if we are in different political parties. And I really would love to know who you would like to see run. Who would be the best president right now, all politics and fundraising ability aside? All best wishes to you. Ann
Norm February 26, 2011 at 10:10 pm
I am a Democrat and I like Obama, but things aren't that rosy.
Robert February 28, 2011 at 01:57 am
Hi Ann -
I would like to see Hillary primary with Obama on the Democratic side. It will not happen but it would be interesting. In my opinion, she has a lot to offer in experience with more time dealing with Congress and International affairs. It would be good to have a choice but it will not happen. Obama will win in 2012 unless there is massive national change in local voter registration reform. Continue
Robert February 28, 2011 at 01:58 am
The Republican side is still run by the Washington elites and they will stay with the same old tired platform and candidates. McCain is out, but Romney, Huckabee and Giuliani will more than like be in the mix and be supported by the Republican establishment. Ron Paul will be in the mix and will have a stronger than normal following but not from the Republican establishment. Frankly I would not support any Republican for president because none that I know about are qualified or experience enough.
Palin and other real conservative candidates will not run in 2012 for President and that is a good thing. Conservatives are in the process of taking over the Republican Party from the local level. Conservatives have just begun and last year was a very good year for them with over 600 conservative being elective to state office. As far as conservatives are concerned, Obama is a gift from God that will continue to give to the conservative racks as long as he is in office. Conservatives will use the Obama gifts to change State legislatures and governors. The states that do not change will be driven to their knees by bankruptcy (cont)
Robert February 28, 2011 at 01:59 am
In 2012 the Republicans will control the Senate and the Conservatives will take control of the House and that will effectively shut down the Obama legislative agenda. Of course he will continue to rule by executive order until he leaves office but funds will be limited, investigations will keep his administration tied up and growing state governments’ resistance to his rule will grow until Federal authority will be ignored.
Having said all the above – I support Obama but will not vote for him. He is the real Hope of the conservative movement that will bring real Change to the country – just not in the way he believes. Cheers - Robert
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Morimoto June 11, 2013 at 05:26 pm
For all skill levels. (I got cut off.) Kids' hear athlete's inspiring stories and sing fun songsRead More too. See www.unionpc.org for details and registration forms.
David June 7, 2013 at 11:58 pm
Oh and they also take a spelling of "its" and put [sic] after it because they think theRead More possessive pronoun is spelled it's which is a common mistake. :) Since they cannot spell, they must be wrong.
David June 8, 2013 at 12:05 am
LASD wasn't faced with spending $20M on lawyers vs $200M on real estate. They think they can useRead More Raynor and keep the cost for one school down to $50M or so, but that will never be used by BCS. It will end up being either ruled illegal or it will be an albatross around the district's finances for years to come. They'll blame BCS for the stupid move. But what is really important is that ongoing legal battles or not, BCS had agreed to accept the split if only $500K more were spent on getting Blach into shape. While the only firm committment was for 1 year, it was obvious that LASD could have come back and gotten that agreement set for 3 years, by which time all sorts of dust would have settled. That was a wise option, and by far the cheaper one. There can always be new lawsuits. What you need to worry about is this years, just like the facilities process for charter schools.
Joan J. Strong June 8, 2013 at 12:35 am
Just because there is no rule requiring something doesn't mean there's necessarily a rule forbiddingRead More something. Otherwise walking with shoes on would be illegal. BCS has never, ever, ever agreed to "accept the split". That is a lie that the BCS regime and their sycophants repeat ad nauseum, but it's still a lie. Earlier this year they crafted a counter-offer over which they ALL BUT PROMISED TO SUE over. They carefully worded it in such a way that would be 100% consistent with a lawsuit over their very own counter-offer. In other words, BCS said, "if you don't accept this counter-offer that goes above and beyond the legally necessary facilities... we'll sue.... if you accept it... we'll sue anyhow". They think we're stupid. We're not.
David May 31, 2013 at 12:57 pm
Are you talking about having an associate teacher at each grade level or about the provision of aRead More special education aide for each grade level? Either one is very different from LASD but if you mean both that's very interesting. The aides are compensated at lower hourly rates than the teachers, but in LASD there is not even 1 full aide per school aside from SDC aides. Egan has no aides and Blach only has 0.80 FTE of aide time.
David May 31, 2013 at 01:12 pm
Oh, there are different kinds of aides. I referred to the 1-1 personal aides above. The resourcesRead More specialist certificated teachers at the LASD schools also work with aides and there are generally between 1 and 2 FTE of that kind of aide time at a school. Interestingly in this category Egan has 1 RSP and 0.8 classified time whereas Blach which has all the Jr High SDC classes not only has the staffing for that, but in the RSP area has 1.6 RSP teachers and 4.1 classified time as well. so more than SDC classes are concentrated at Blach.
Philip Aaronson May 31, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Sorry, yes, associate teachers. These are fully credentialed teachers. It's excellent as thereRead More appears to be much more natural coverage for teacher absences (vs. substitute teachers), maternity leaves, and they can work as aides for 1-1 time as well as an excellent training opportunity for less experienced teachers - all rolled into one.