Poll: Should Delta Water Be Sent from Northern California to the Southland?

Governor Jerry Brown wants to spend $14 billion for a pair of tunnels that would carry water from the Sacramento River to areas in the South. Does the idea make sense?


The news came to us late Wednesday:

"Gov. Jerry Brown and federal officials today announced plans for a future water delivery system that includes the construction of a $14 billion pair of tunnels that would divert water from the Sacramento River. The side-by-side underground tunnels, 33 feet in diameter, would run beneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and carry water 35 miles to pumps near Tracy to be distributed for human consumption and agribusiness outside of the immediate Delta area."

Supporters say the planned facilities would:

  • Stop the reversal of water flow caused by existing pumps in the southern Delta which some officials call "fish-killing pumps"
  • Provide seismic benefits for a statewide water system that would sustain water supply in an earthquake
  • Guarantee a stable water supply
  • Improve water quality

Opponents argue it would create immense problems for an already-fragile Delta, pulling 9,000 cubic feet of water per second from the Sacramento River, ruining the surrounding ecosystem. There is also concern in proceeding with the project without a full understanding of what the impact would be on native salmon and smelt.

State officials counter that these questions will have answers, but those answers will come concurrent with scientific studies carried out during construction. The state hopes to begin the project in 2017.

A number of state and federal elected officials - including Anna Eshoo, D-Palo Alto; and Jackie Speier, D-San Mateo/San Francisco - along with fishermen and conservationists, have come out against the plan. Said Speier, "I concur with my colleagues to go back to the drawing board. In this case, Northern Californians are the losers."

U.S. Rep. John Garamendi, D-Fairfield urges the governor to preserve the Delta with a focus on water storage, recycling, conservation, levee repairs and habitat restoration. He said that the plan would essentially suck the Sacramento River dry and that the project amounts to "a plumbing system for the Delta."

Environmentalists, farmers and fisherman working with Restore the Delta, the Sierra Club and other groups have blasted the governor's proposal, labeling it a "scheme" that would benefit the Westlands Water District, which supplies agricultural water to Fresno and Kings counties.

The Santa Clara Valley Water District is in favor of the project. In a release, CEO Beau Goldie states "The Bay Delta Conservation Plan is the best hope to address the challenges of a deteriorating Delta ecosystem and avoiding water shortages from a failure of the water conveyance system."

Members from the Western Growers, which represents local and regional family farmers in Arizona and California, have expressed support for Brown's plan for the Delta, calling it "an important milestone that would have remained elusive without this leadership and focus."

What do you think? Are Governor Brown, state and federal officials, and local water districts on the right path in an effort to repair the Delta? Or is this the wrong way to move forward? Are Northern Californians the "losers" here?

Tell us in the comments. Then vote in our poll.

(Bay City News contributed content to this piece)

Westmont Place Townhomes July 28, 2012 at 08:33 PM
No we need to keep the water here! Hands off our water SoCal! Not then, Not now, Not EVER!
Patrick T. Ferraro July 29, 2012 at 01:24 AM
Is Campbell Patch trying to find out how many people locally don't know that half their water comes from the Delta. Silicon Valley never could have prospered if we did not tap the Delta, first in 1965 through the State Water Project and then in 1987 through the Federal Central Valley Project. Plus we also get 15% of our water from Hetch Hetchy, in case you support taking that dam down too.
Anton Tomas July 29, 2012 at 03:30 PM
Noone owns water in this state. The question is false on its face. I'm sure splitting the state into a politically and economically powerful south, and then agrarian, undeveloped NorCal is the best idea!
Sketch Sketchy July 29, 2012 at 06:00 PM
Brown is all about paying unions massive amounts for massive public works projects. How many of you voted for this bozo?
goodeyejohn July 30, 2012 at 02:33 AM
Southern Cal is running out of valuable water skiing areas. Only 47% of this source will be used for water recreation. That's less than half...Jeez have a cow will ya. Some days it's foggy at the beach so we head in land for some skiing. Thanks everybody.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »