.
Feedback

Council Reopens Downtown Building Height Debate

Mayor Carpenter and Ron Packard say they regret earlier decisions that opened "Pandora's box" to allowing taller buildings.

Expressing regret over earlier downtown zoning decisions that allowed for taller buildings, Mayor Val Carpenter and Councilmember Ron Packard successfully convinced the council on Tuesday to reopen the debate over building heights on Main and State streets.

“I am absolutely opposed to three-story buildings in the core of our downtown,” Packard told council. “I’ve supported, and was heavily involved, in opening Pandora’s box in the outside areas. But when it comes to the core, I am absolutely opposed to three story buildings, and I want no question about that.”

While some council members were hesitant to change downtown zoning, the council unanimously agreed to have staff begin the process of possibly tweaking codes by bringing recommendations to the planning commission, and later to council, allowing for public discussion on the issue.

In years past, both Packard and Carpenter led the way to change downtown zoning codes to "form-based" codes, considered by many a more modern way of engaging in city planning. In form-based codes, the emphasis is on a structure’s form and relation to the surrounding city area, and not on specifics like floor area ratios, setbacks, parking ratios, and other aspects, including how many stories are allowed.

There is a 30-foot height limit in the downtown core, but Carpenter lamented what she called “height creep”, the process by which developers are able to exceed building height limits through variances for certain aspects of their projects, such as towers.

She said she is “sad” about the four-story project on First Street on the site of the old Post Office, which is outside of the core of the downtown, where a 45-foot limit is allowed.

“I am concerned … that with some of the applications we’ve seen, or will see, that we’ll get increasing pressure to work around the 30-foot height limit,” she said.

Councilmember Megan Satterlee, who agreed she did not want to see a downtown full of three-story or more buildings, argued that by restricting developers to only two stories, it would cut off the city’s ability to negotiate for items that may be of public benefit, such as paseos, or pass-throughs, from parking areas to the street.

“The language proposed here really shuts the door on the conversation,” she said.

She said she would support reopening the issue if ways to preserve form-based zoning were pursued, making it “crystal clear” to developers what the city wants in terms of preserving most of the core of downtown.

“Let’s not throw out the change, let’s solve that piece that isn’t working to our expectations and address it,” she said.

Councilmember Jarrett Fishpaw was in agreement with Satterlee on the issue. Councilmemer David Casas, who was open to the possibility of three stories for some buildings, said he thought it would "serve the community well to have this discussion."

Several speakers told the council they were in favor of the earlier changes made to the zoning, and urged the council to not eliminate those changes.

Brooke Ray Smith of Passerelle Investments said it is important for building codes to remain flexible.

“If the framework is too restrictive, the resulting projects are uninspired, or even worse, no one will want to build at all.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.
Karen Janowski April 22, 2013 at 12:19 pm
And you can join the Drive Less Challenge that starts today and runs for the next two weeks. JoinRead More any time during the 2-week period. Check it out at www.DriveLessChallengeLA.com. Try out some alternative transportation, like bicycling or walking (or even carpooling with other families) with your kids to school, bike to the grocery store for those one or two items or walk to the local coffee shop instead of driving. Take the train on a weekend adventure to San Francisco or light rail to San Jose. It's a good opportunity to try something you might not have done before. Have fun with it!