.
Feedback

This Week From the Los Altos Police Log: Dec. 30-Jan. 5, 2012

The busiest part of the week came early, and the end of the week we barely noticed. Well, there was that live powerline that came down downtown...

All the excitement happened during the holiday weekend. By the end of the week, we were back to the same-old, same-old. By then, we guess, people were finally at work, or school, and just tending to business.

The New Year's Eve weekend, however, was the last chance to be a little crazy, for Los Altos. It was replete with teenagers caught stuffing beer in a backpack at Safeway on 160 First Street at 9:37 p.m., Dec. 30, a driving-under-the influence  arrest on the corner of Victor Way and Castro Street in Mountain View at 2:19 a.m. Saturday, as part of an intense regional-wide anti-DUI push over the holidays. There was also the requisite loud party going into New Year's morning. Police responded to a noise complaint at 1 a.m. about a home on the 900 block of Clinton Avenue, and reprimanded the loud ones.

And for some, it's hard to see the party stop. On Monday was the odd case of a customer drinking in the aisles of Safeway. Police said a man began opening bottles of wine and drinking them in the liquor department—at 8:17 a.m. Emloyees called the police, but the man left before officers arrived. 

After the holidays were indeed over, however, we were back to fender-benders and stranded motorists. On Tuesday, an officer assisted drivers who were involved in a small traffic accident at 2:43 p.m., near the intersection of Manor and Aura streets. The same day, there were two small, single-car accidents resulting in only property damage. The first was at 12:30 p.m. near Plaza South and San Antonio Road. The second was at 5:38 p.m. near Plaza North and Second Street; where a vehicle hit a parked vehicle in the lot. There was a minor injury accident at 6:18 p.m., at the intersection of Foothill Expressway and Vineyard Drive, also on Tuesday.

Residents were content to keep their eyes out for anything that looked amiss. Wednesday, alone, was a good day for calling police for suspicious people, vehicles or circumstances. At 9:31 a.m., Orange Avenue and Sherman Avenue; at 1:43 p.m., on the 400 block of Guadalupe Avenue, at 3:30 p.m., on the 300 block of Distel Circle, at 5:39 p.m., near Granger Avenue and Loyola Drive, and at 11:35 p.m., on 700 block of Berry Avenue. In the last case, the reports of subjects acting suspiciously, resulted in a reprimand, and the subjects were released. On Thursday, two more incidents were reported without enough substance for a report. The first was at 12:38 a.m.,was at West Portola Ave and Los Altos Ave, where police officers responded to a report of a suspicious person and determined it to be unfounded At 8:43 p.m., on Otis Way, officers responded to a suspicious circumstances call but wrote no report.

A coyote was spotted by a caller on at 8:36 a.m. Thursday in the vicinity of St. Joseph Avenue, Robinhood Lane and Nottingham Way, but was gone by the time officers arrived.

high voltage line came down at 9:08 a.m. in front of the Comerica Bank at 275 3rd St. Police cordoned off area, and power was restored by PG&E about four hours later.

The most serious case was a domestic violence incident in progress on El Camino Real and Escuela Avenue that resulted in an arrest in Mountain View on Thursday at 9:38 p.m.

Sgt. Cameron Shearer said a Los Alto Police officer on patrol witnessed a young woman get punched in the eye after she pushed her 19-year-old male companion. The officer arrested the Mountain View man, who Shearer declined to identify because the 16-year-old female, also a Mountain View resident, would be able more readily identified, he said. The man was booked on a felony domestic violence charge at San Jose Jail.

 

 

 


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Joan J. Strong May 22, 2013 at 11:21 am
Corrections: 1. Straw man attack: nobody is blaming BCS for district-wide growth. Nobody. 2. BCSRead More does not get "half the funding" of LASD. BCS gets about 6500 and LASD gets about 9500. The BCS program for typical children costs about twice as much as the comparable LASD program. BCS is simple an expensive hybrid public/private school, nothing more. 3. Mr. Roode pointed out that there are about 100 or so special ed. students at LASD (I cannot verify this but it seems very low). LASD calls out an annual expense of $7.5 million for special ed. meaning each of these students cost LASD $75,000, not $1,000 as he implied. 4. The law and the courts have ALREADY compelled LASD to give reasonably equivalent facilities and they have. BCS has a lower student/teacher ratio meaning that they have more classrooms for the same number of kids. This is not, legally speaking, LASD's problem. 5. Mr. Roode has yet to explain how the Covington campus could be 16 acres. Further, he continues to spread the fallacy that campuses ACREAGE is even remotely relevant to its student capacity. Campuses are limited by their location and traffic, not how many acres of grass there is in the back. 6. Were it not for BCS, we would have passed a bond in the last election, as the polling shows. BCS litigation has ripped our community apart and has left it with a mountain to climb when it comes to operating in a normal fashion.
L.A. Chung (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
@David R. I think Homestead uses EarthCare Recycling, based on its April 6 E-Waste collection dayRead More publicity (http://bit.ly/10mIV14) : www.earthcarerecycling.com "Recycle FREE your old electronic equipment - working or not! Anything with a plug or PC board inside. Also accepted are non-household batteries, VHS tapes and other media, and scrap metal. Visit www.earthcarerecycling.com for a list of accepted items. "
David R. May 21, 2013 at 10:26 pm
What kind of bins are there? Do you take used CDROMs? How about VHS tapes? Cables and wire?
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.