.
Feedback

One-Fourth DUI Arrests in Santa Clara County on Tuesday as in 2011

There were 11 'Avoid the 13' arrests Tuesday as opposed to 45 in 2011, according to 'Avoid the 13' statistics.

The Independence Day “Avoid the 13” DUI crackdown on Tuesday yielded 11 arrests in comparison to 45 in 2011 during the same 24-hour time period.

Officers representing Santa Clara Clara County law enforcement agencies made the arrests between 12:01 a.m. and 11:59 p.m. Tuesday, said San Jose Srg. Jose Cardoza. As of Wednesday afternoon, there had not been any July 4 arrests.


The campaign is cracking down on alcohol or drug impaired driving through increased sobriety checkpoints, and roving and saturation points, among other methods, according to the CHP.

On Wednesday, extra DUI saturation patrols are being deployed in Los Altos, Campbell, Mountain View, Santa Clara and San Jose.

Below are the arrests that have been made so far in the two-day campaign, according to Srg. Cardoza. Last year’s campaign totaled five days.

Agency 7/3 7/4 Total Campbell 1 0 1 CHP-H/G 0 0 0 CHP-SJ 5 0 5 Gilroy 0 0 0 Los Altos 0 0 0 Los Gatos 0 0 0 Milpitas 1 0 1 Morgan Hill 1 0 1 Mountain View 0 0 0 Palo Alto 1 0 1 San Jose 2 0 2 Santa Clara 0 0 0 Sheriff 0 0 0 SJ University 0 0 0 Daily Total 11 0 11

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.