.
Feedback

Fired Tech Employee Killed Manager in 2008 Out of Revenge, Says Prosecutor

The trial begins for Jing Hua Wu, charged with three counts of murder of his co-workers, including Los Altos resident Brian Pugh.

A prosecutor in the trial of a man accused of killing three managers at a Santa Clara semiconductor company in 2008 said Thursday the defendant was resentful about being fired from his $125,000-a-year job and returned a day later to shoot the victims to death.

Mountain View resident Jing Hua Wu, a former testing engineer for the firm SiPort, Inc., "begged for his job" back during a follow-up meeting with the three victims the afternoon of Nov. 14, 2008, and when they refused, he shot them, Deputy District Attorney Tim McInerny said.

"Revenge. That's what this murder comes down to," McInerny said in his opening statement in Santa Clara County Superior Court in San Jose this morning.

Wu, 51, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder with special circumstances for the deaths of Fremont resident SiPort CEO Sid Agrawal, 56; its vice president of operations Brian Pugh, 47 of Los Altos; and human resources manager Marilyn Lewis, 67, from San Jose.

The special-circumstance allegations could make Wu eligible for the death penalty if he is convicted.

SiPort, which made HD radio chips, was bought by Intel in 2011.

Thursday in court, McInerny showed jurors graphic autopsy photos of the three victims and their bullet wounds.

He said Wu had purchased a small 9mm handgun, used it to practice at a gun range in Milpitas, and bought 100 rounds of ammunition two days before the shootings—six of which he used to shoot the victims at close range.

Moments before the shootings occurred inside Agrawal's office, employees said they overheard Agrawal exclaim, "We don't have to do it like that," to which Wu replied, "I don't care, you're just going to send me to jail," McInerny told jurors.

McInerny said the killings were "planned, purposeful and premeditated."

In his opening statement, Wu's defense lawyer, San Francisco civil rights attorney Tony Serra, described his client as "a law-abiding man, family man prior to this horrible, horrible episode," which he said resulted from Wu's family struggles in China and mental illness.

Serra said Wu grew up in Communist China. He lived through the Great Famine period of 1958 to 1961 when many people starved, and was there for the Cultural Revolution beginning in the mid-1960s, when Wu's family was denounced for its previous ties to the Nationalist China movement.

Wu was repeatedly beaten for being associated with the nationalists' group and once was shoved into water and nearly drowned by political opponents, causing him to suffer from post-traumatic distress disorder, Serra said.

"His whole family would hide at home at night to escape the bullying," Serra said. "He grew up fearful, he grew up distressed. He grew up in a lifelong depression."

The defendant's mother and grandmother had histories of severe mental illness, and Wu himself has suffered from paranoid delusions. He has been treated for a serious form of depression and has thoughts of suicide, Serra said.

In the years prior to the shootings, Wu had money invested real estate whose value declined steeply during the U.S. economic downturn in 2008, Serra said. He faced bankruptcy, humiliation for him and his family, and then the loss of this job, the attorney said.

Wu started to have hallucinations and considered suicide prior to the shootings, and then "blacked out" and recalls shooting Pugh but not killing Agrawal or Lewis, Serra said.

Serra said the defense plans to discuss seven diagnoses from experts about Wu's "mental diseases and defects."

The defense also will offer proof that Wu's sufferings in China and his mental health problems formed the foundation for the shootings.

"We have a good, strong case as to his mentality," Serra said. "The evidence is going to show he was very, very mentally ill."

Serra concluded by telling jurors that the defense will provide them with reasonable doubt to refute the murder charges and instead convict Wu on the lesser charge of manslaughter.

Copyright © 2013 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Replication or retransmission without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

Patch's newsletter for headlines on Los Altos and surrounding areas, follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.