.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: Vote 'No on B' is the Right Thing to Do

If a raft of environmentalists oppose it, should you, asks this water engineer?

Dear Editor,

If the Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Measure B was going to do what it claimed, environmentalists would have supported it enthusiastically. But the environmental community is divided. Those who expect more environmentally are voting "NO on B" - to send the Water District back to come up with a supportable measure by June 2016.

Groups like Environmentalists for Living Streams, Friends of Coyote Creek, Salmonid and Steelhead Restoration Group, Western Waters Canoe Club are opposed; groups like the Sierra Club (Loma Prieta) and Santa Clara County Creeks Coalition, both refused to endorse, declaring themselves “neutral.” 

Measure B claims to be a mixture of: water supply, earthquake repairs to dams, pollution abatement, habitat restoration and flood control.

Opposition comes because, below the surface of the public relations pitches, not all is as it seems.  

Take the District’s Anderson Dam assertions. They say if Measure B fails in 2012 and waits until 2016, that “urgent seismic upgrades” will be delayed. But, in fact, the dam repairs will proceed on schedule funded by the Water Bills, not the tax. The money for dams was included in Measure B, not because the Water Bills wouldn’t cover it, but rather because it “plays well.” Voters concerned about the dams will be fooled into thinking that voting for Measure B is voting for dam repairs – disguising the Measure’s real purpose.

Measure B is mostly about flood control with lip service to the environment.   Measure B’s flood control related projects (including those from the existing parcel tax) amount to 65 percent of total project funding.

Admittedly, there is, indeed, money for pollution abatement and wildlife habitat.  But most of that is not focused on what will actually improve water quality or critical habitat. A few excellent projects are included to appeal to environmental voters. But most of the money is wasted; this is not a good investment of our taxpayer dollars. 

Let’s rewrite Measure B – include the Measure’s good points while refocusing it to achieve  real environmental goals. Bring it back to the voters in June 2016.

If you care about streams,  vote NO on Measure B.

By,

Richard McMurtry, water engineer, coordinator of Environmentalists for Living Streams 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.
Karen Janowski April 22, 2013 at 12:19 pm
And you can join the Drive Less Challenge that starts today and runs for the next two weeks. JoinRead More any time during the 2-week period. Check it out at www.DriveLessChallengeLA.com. Try out some alternative transportation, like bicycling or walking (or even carpooling with other families) with your kids to school, bike to the grocery store for those one or two items or walk to the local coffee shop instead of driving. Take the train on a weekend adventure to San Francisco or light rail to San Jose. It's a good opportunity to try something you might not have done before. Have fun with it!