Dear Editor,
In listening to the Los Altos City Council on Dec. 11 discuss the lack of
"logical" basis for parent support of neighborhood schools, it became
apparent that some individuals do not fully understand why the Los
neighborhood schools. Council member (Val) Carpenter stated that close
relationships can also be formed at private schools as has been her
personal experience. My own family experience indicates that there are
other benefits to be found in our local public schools. Beyond the
obvious opportunity to know one's neighbors better and form close local
bonds, neighborhood schools encourage independence in our children and
appreciation of children from many walks of life.
Children who play or work on projects with their classmates can often
walk or bike independently within their neighborhood. As children
become older and gradually expand their 'neighborhood' to the junior
high schools and high schools, they learn to move independently within
and across the towns and can take responsibility for their own
planning and scheduling. When neighbors recognize children and know
other families through school, they know more about where each child
should be and what is appropriate behavior. This makes for a safe
place to practice independence and, in our small community, "It Takes
a Village" certainly applies.
Another benefit of neighborhood public schools, is that the children
who attend them are filtered only by their residence address. Unlike
parochial schools, there is no bias toward a single religious group.
Further, there is no requirement that parents be capable of paying
tuition nor must the children pass any tests to be enrollment. Every
child who applies is accepted. This means that children attend school
with those of many backgrounds and personal abilities, at least as
much as is possible within our affluent community. This is not an
opportunity that all private school children will enjoy.
Beyond the benefit of close bonds, neighborhood schools also help the
community in that a majority of our children walk or bike to school on
many days. While I do see a few students bicycling to Pinewood or even
Waldorf Schools, in general, there is obviously less traffic impact
from children who can walk and bike.
While many families chose to prioritize different benefits found in
private schools or the charter school, 4,500 students attend LASD
schools, and the great majority do so because they appreciate the
benefits of a high-quality education that is shared with their local
community. A failure to understand this choice by our local elected
officials and dismissal of its importance to our families does not
serve to bring a solution to the community. We all need to respect the
choices that various families make for their children in a way that
does not rate one choice as the most valid.
My personal belief is that we will not be able to move toward solution
until an independent site can be found for Bullis Charter School which does not
invalidate the neighborhood school choice made by other families or
disrupt the education of LASD children. We finally have an improving
economy and rising home values that can make a new facility possible
and will retain the high home values lent by our strong school system.
I ask that all of our local representatives, parents and community
members to join together in achieving a rejoining of our now-divided
community.
Best regards,
Tamara Logan
Vice President, Los Altos School Board of Trustees
Los Altos Patch welcomes letters to the editor. Send them to losaltos@patch.com
