.
Feedback

First Street: Too Narrow?

People are commenting, not always positively, about the new First Street streetscape, noting the narrowness of the travel lanes.

Around town, I have heard a few random remarks about the new First Street streetscape that the roadway seems quite narrow.  This was reinforced when a friend sent me a photo of a sign that had appeared in Peet's Coffee recently.  The sign said:

If you have ridden your bicycle through the "Gaunlet" of the new First Street Phase One and now know they are going to do the same to the rest of First Street (see drawing below), maybe now is a good time to express your feelings to the members of the city council that approved it.

This was followed by the names and email addresses of the current City Council, and an annotated map of the streetscape.

I remember well the September 8, 2009 City Council meeting where the current streetscape was approved. There was considerable debate about the width of the roadway relative to the sidewalk.

Then-mayor Megan Satterlee argued in favor of narrowing the sidewalks between State St. and Edith Avenue in order to provide better accommodation for bicycles, especially for bicycles that might travel down Los Altos Avenue, which continues as First Street at Edith Avenue. She did support the as-built design between State and Main streets, noting that the increased foot traffic between Main and State Streets probably justified the current sidewalk width in that area.

In the end, the Council voted 4-1, with Mayor Satterlee dissenting, to approve the streetscape as presented instead of one of the alternatives that might have better accommodated bicycles.  I urge interested parties to review the video of the Council meeting, by going to http://losaltosca.gov/citycouncil/online/index.html and selecting the meeting and clicking "Video". 

The agenda item begins at 53:20 into the recording and lasts nearly an hour, and gives considerable insight into the way that bicycle transportation is viewed by our Council.  The key part of the discussion begins about 1:45:00 in the recording, where Mayor Satterlee made the following comment:

"...connecting with that Class 2 bike lane that comes from Los Altos Avenue, and providing opportunity to park your bike and visit downtown, I think strikes a better balance than this which really puts bikes last."

In subsequent discussion, however, other Council members argued in favor of wider sidewalks.

Two minor errors in the sign that had appeared at Peets: The project that was approved doesn't affect the entire length of First Street, just the section between Main Street and Edith Avenue.  Also, it was Lou Becker who voted in favor of this design, not current Council member Jarrett Fishpaw.

If you have feelings about this project, either in favor of or in opposition to the current design, it's a fine idea to let your Council know your opinions. While it may be too late to influence this particular project, public input on our transportation facilities, and the knowledge that we will hold our Council accountable for their actions in this area, is vital.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Joan J. Strong May 22, 2013 at 11:21 am
Corrections: 1. Straw man attack: nobody is blaming BCS for district-wide growth. Nobody. 2. BCSRead More does not get "half the funding" of LASD. BCS gets about 6500 and LASD gets about 9500. The BCS program for typical children costs about twice as much as the comparable LASD program. BCS is simple an expensive hybrid public/private school, nothing more. 3. Mr. Roode pointed out that there are about 100 or so special ed. students at LASD (I cannot verify this but it seems very low). LASD calls out an annual expense of $7.5 million for special ed. meaning each of these students cost LASD $75,000, not $1,000 as he implied. 4. The law and the courts have ALREADY compelled LASD to give reasonably equivalent facilities and they have. BCS has a lower student/teacher ratio meaning that they have more classrooms for the same number of kids. This is not, legally speaking, LASD's problem. 5. Mr. Roode has yet to explain how the Covington campus could be 16 acres. Further, he continues to spread the fallacy that campuses ACREAGE is even remotely relevant to its student capacity. Campuses are limited by their location and traffic, not how many acres of grass there is in the back. 6. Were it not for BCS, we would have passed a bond in the last election, as the polling shows. BCS litigation has ripped our community apart and has left it with a mountain to climb when it comes to operating in a normal fashion.
L.A. Chung (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
@David R. I think Homestead uses EarthCare Recycling, based on its April 6 E-Waste collection dayRead More publicity (http://bit.ly/10mIV14) : www.earthcarerecycling.com "Recycle FREE your old electronic equipment - working or not! Anything with a plug or PC board inside. Also accepted are non-household batteries, VHS tapes and other media, and scrap metal. Visit www.earthcarerecycling.com for a list of accepted items. "
David R. May 21, 2013 at 10:26 pm
What kind of bins are there? Do you take used CDROMs? How about VHS tapes? Cables and wire?
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.