.
Feedback

First Street: Too Narrow?

People are commenting, not always positively, about the new First Street streetscape, noting the narrowness of the travel lanes.

Around town, I have heard a few random remarks about the new First Street streetscape that the roadway seems quite narrow.  This was reinforced when a friend sent me a photo of a sign that had appeared in Peet's Coffee recently.  The sign said:

If you have ridden your bicycle through the "Gaunlet" of the new First Street Phase One and now know they are going to do the same to the rest of First Street (see drawing below), maybe now is a good time to express your feelings to the members of the city council that approved it.

This was followed by the names and email addresses of the current City Council, and an annotated map of the streetscape.

I remember well the September 8, 2009 City Council meeting where the current streetscape was approved. There was considerable debate about the width of the roadway relative to the sidewalk.

Then-mayor Megan Satterlee argued in favor of narrowing the sidewalks between State St. and Edith Avenue in order to provide better accommodation for bicycles, especially for bicycles that might travel down Los Altos Avenue, which continues as First Street at Edith Avenue. She did support the as-built design between State and Main streets, noting that the increased foot traffic between Main and State Streets probably justified the current sidewalk width in that area.

In the end, the Council voted 4-1, with Mayor Satterlee dissenting, to approve the streetscape as presented instead of one of the alternatives that might have better accommodated bicycles.  I urge interested parties to review the video of the Council meeting, by going to http://losaltosca.gov/citycouncil/online/index.html and selecting the meeting and clicking "Video". 

The agenda item begins at 53:20 into the recording and lasts nearly an hour, and gives considerable insight into the way that bicycle transportation is viewed by our Council.  The key part of the discussion begins about 1:45:00 in the recording, where Mayor Satterlee made the following comment:

"...connecting with that Class 2 bike lane that comes from Los Altos Avenue, and providing opportunity to park your bike and visit downtown, I think strikes a better balance than this which really puts bikes last."

In subsequent discussion, however, other Council members argued in favor of wider sidewalks.

Two minor errors in the sign that had appeared at Peets: The project that was approved doesn't affect the entire length of First Street, just the section between Main Street and Edith Avenue.  Also, it was Lou Becker who voted in favor of this design, not current Council member Jarrett Fishpaw.

If you have feelings about this project, either in favor of or in opposition to the current design, it's a fine idea to let your Council know your opinions. While it may be too late to influence this particular project, public input on our transportation facilities, and the knowledge that we will hold our Council accountable for their actions in this area, is vital.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Gary Hedden February 27, 2012 at 01:48 pm
Hello Jim,
I ride downtown quite a bit and the narrow section between State and Main works because it is so short. Drivers here are pretty pleasant for the most part and will tolerate bikes for such a short section, but if it were to be whole length of First Street - that would be really pushing it. For that we need a proper bike lane.
Jim Fenton February 28, 2012 at 03:54 am
Hi Gary -
A short section of narrow road is of course easier to navigate, and causes less delay for faster vehicles, than a long section. But not all bicyclists are as experienced as you: we need to accommodate kids, families, and infrequent bikers as well. What seems to be a short distance to you might seem quite long to others.
Katie February 29, 2012 at 02:18 pm
I ride my bike to work everyday and I go the entire length of First Street. It is extremely dangerous because you have cars parked on the side that will open their doors without warning. There is also the danger of frustrated drivers who zoom past me and can cause an accident going the other way. Why isn't there a bike lane on First Street? Or even a protected bike lane that is on the inside of parked cars so there isn't the danger of being doored? Check out this cycle track http://www.flickr.com/photos/beyonddc/5760682008/in/set-72157622405652500
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Morimoto June 11, 2013 at 05:26 pm
For all skill levels. (I got cut off.) Kids' hear athlete's inspiring stories and sing fun songsRead More too. See www.unionpc.org for details and registration forms.
David June 7, 2013 at 11:58 pm
Oh and they also take a spelling of "its" and put [sic] after it because they think theRead More possessive pronoun is spelled it's which is a common mistake. :) Since they cannot spell, they must be wrong.
David June 8, 2013 at 12:05 am
LASD wasn't faced with spending $20M on lawyers vs $200M on real estate. They think they can useRead More Raynor and keep the cost for one school down to $50M or so, but that will never be used by BCS. It will end up being either ruled illegal or it will be an albatross around the district's finances for years to come. They'll blame BCS for the stupid move. But what is really important is that ongoing legal battles or not, BCS had agreed to accept the split if only $500K more were spent on getting Blach into shape. While the only firm committment was for 1 year, it was obvious that LASD could have come back and gotten that agreement set for 3 years, by which time all sorts of dust would have settled. That was a wise option, and by far the cheaper one. There can always be new lawsuits. What you need to worry about is this years, just like the facilities process for charter schools.
Joan J. Strong June 8, 2013 at 12:35 am
Just because there is no rule requiring something doesn't mean there's necessarily a rule forbiddingRead More something. Otherwise walking with shoes on would be illegal. BCS has never, ever, ever agreed to "accept the split". That is a lie that the BCS regime and their sycophants repeat ad nauseum, but it's still a lie. Earlier this year they crafted a counter-offer over which they ALL BUT PROMISED TO SUE over. They carefully worded it in such a way that would be 100% consistent with a lawsuit over their very own counter-offer. In other words, BCS said, "if you don't accept this counter-offer that goes above and beyond the legally necessary facilities... we'll sue.... if you accept it... we'll sue anyhow". They think we're stupid. We're not.
David May 31, 2013 at 12:57 pm
Are you talking about having an associate teacher at each grade level or about the provision of aRead More special education aide for each grade level? Either one is very different from LASD but if you mean both that's very interesting. The aides are compensated at lower hourly rates than the teachers, but in LASD there is not even 1 full aide per school aside from SDC aides. Egan has no aides and Blach only has 0.80 FTE of aide time.
David May 31, 2013 at 01:12 pm
Oh, there are different kinds of aides. I referred to the 1-1 personal aides above. The resourcesRead More specialist certificated teachers at the LASD schools also work with aides and there are generally between 1 and 2 FTE of that kind of aide time at a school. Interestingly in this category Egan has 1 RSP and 0.8 classified time whereas Blach which has all the Jr High SDC classes not only has the staffing for that, but in the RSP area has 1.6 RSP teachers and 4.1 classified time as well. so more than SDC classes are concentrated at Blach.
Philip Aaronson May 31, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Sorry, yes, associate teachers. These are fully credentialed teachers. It's excellent as thereRead More appears to be much more natural coverage for teacher absences (vs. substitute teachers), maternity leaves, and they can work as aides for 1-1 time as well as an excellent training opportunity for less experienced teachers - all rolled into one.