.
Feedback

Non-Fiction Really Can be Fun for Kids. Really.

Oh, the dreaded non-fiction books for kids. Yes ... I am going there.

 

OK, the dreaded non-fiction books for kids category.  Yes ... I am going there.

I have to say that kids do love the weird and strange animal books, the funny fact books and some of the history of war books, but sadly these are not the books I am talking about.  

I am talking about the straight-up non-fiction books, that tell the story of real people and events. These are the books that include facts, dates, definitions and places. I know that many kids (and frankly, this adult) shudder at the thought of reading these books. They lack imagination, exciting narrative and the leap from reality.


But sadly, we can't give in to our temptation to run from these stories. With the new common core standards being implemented nationwide, kids will be reading more and more non-fiction. We are trying to prepare our children to become literate in a world where they are required to become responsible citizens, prepare for careers, and better understand the real challenges that face the nations around us. As a result, they need to be able to understand and use evidence to come to reasonable conclusions, and non-fiction is a wonderful vehicle to help them develop these skills.

Happily, non-fiction continues to get better and better for children. The stories are more compelling and are written in a way that will engage kids.  But this genre is not always going to appeal to kids immediately. They need to develop this skill set, and when they do, they will see how exciting and liberating the knowledge gained through books can be.

So, encourage your kids to step out of their comfort zone. I hope this week's offerings will provide a nice bridge between fiction and non-fiction and show kids that what happens in real life can be just as wondrous and compelling as what is made up in a story.

Title:        Bomb  

Author:    Steve Sheinkin  

Target:     Grades 6 and up 

What this book is about:

This book is a fascinating look at how a discovery in a German lab in 1938, that a uranium atom could split in two, lead to one of the greatest races to make the first atomic bomb. Germany, Russia and the U.S. knew that the first one to have a weapon of this magnitude, would be the one to win the war. They devoted scientists and resources to make this happen, and in the case of Russia, quite a few spies to help speed their process along. This book profiles the US.. program, their patriotism, their eventual success and their self doubt at what they had accomplished.

Why I love this book:

This story was just fascinating. I have to say that some of the more suspenseful scenes, where the U.S. attempts to blow up a heavy water plant in Norway controlled by the Germans, were all the more heart-stopping because it wasn’t fiction. This was real life, and these were real people, and the outcome could be good or bad. I was on the edge of my seat.

I must say that there were a lot of characters in the book, and at times I had trouble keeping track. I would have also liked the pictures scattered throughout the book when they were relevant and not simply at the beginning of a section. I think the photos could have been used in a much more powerful way. I kept flipping back and forth and that stopped the flow of the story for me. But overall, it was as incredible account of the people and events of the time.

Who this book is for:

This book is for older kids. At times it reads like a terrific story, and at others felt more like facts. Kids have to be interested in the subject matter and be willing to wade through some parts that are more data-driven.  I will say the science in the book is not complex. The story is not about physics but about the men and women behind the creation of the bomb.

Final thoughts:

This book is garnering quite a lot of attention, but for me the draw was feeling like I really understood a part of our history with so much more comprehension after having read it. To paraphrase, I felt a whole lot smarter!

To see my full selection of non fiction titles, visit my website at www.onegreatbook.com

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Michael Uhler May 25, 2013 at 10:48 am
These are the special education numbers for LASD and BCS for the 2011-2012 school year, the mostRead More recent year that has complete data: LASD had 462 special education students in a total enrollment of 4,486, or 10.3%. Total education expense was $7,319,175, or $15,842 per special education student. Of this expense, they received $3,549,684 from the SELPA, so their expense was about twice the amount they received. BCS had 29 special education students in a total enrollment of 465, or 6.2%. Total education expense was $221,149, or $7,626 per special education student. Of this expense, they were allocated $295,126 from the SELPA, so their expense was completely paid for by the amount they received (they did not keep the excess - it was returned to the SELPA). Sources: CDE DataQuest, SCCOE, LASD
Joan J. Strong May 22, 2013 at 11:21 am
Corrections: 1. Straw man attack: nobody is blaming BCS for district-wide growth. Nobody. 2. BCSRead More does not get "half the funding" of LASD. BCS gets about 6500 and LASD gets about 9500. The BCS program for typical children costs about twice as much as the comparable LASD program. BCS is simple an expensive hybrid public/private school, nothing more. 3. Mr. Roode pointed out that there are about 100 or so special ed. students at LASD (I cannot verify this but it seems very low). LASD calls out an annual expense of $7.5 million for special ed. meaning each of these students cost LASD $75,000, not $1,000 as he implied. 4. The law and the courts have ALREADY compelled LASD to give reasonably equivalent facilities and they have. BCS has a lower student/teacher ratio meaning that they have more classrooms for the same number of kids. This is not, legally speaking, LASD's problem. 5. Mr. Roode has yet to explain how the Covington campus could be 16 acres. Further, he continues to spread the fallacy that campuses ACREAGE is even remotely relevant to its student capacity. Campuses are limited by their location and traffic, not how many acres of grass there is in the back. 6. Were it not for BCS, we would have passed a bond in the last election, as the polling shows. BCS litigation has ripped our community apart and has left it with a mountain to climb when it comes to operating in a normal fashion.
L.A. Chung (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
@David R. I think Homestead uses EarthCare Recycling, based on its April 6 E-Waste collection dayRead More publicity (http://bit.ly/10mIV14) : www.earthcarerecycling.com "Recycle FREE your old electronic equipment - working or not! Anything with a plug or PC board inside. Also accepted are non-household batteries, VHS tapes and other media, and scrap metal. Visit www.earthcarerecycling.com for a list of accepted items. "
David R. May 21, 2013 at 10:26 pm
What kind of bins are there? Do you take used CDROMs? How about VHS tapes? Cables and wire?
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.