.
Feedback

Proliferation of Preconditions is Perfectly Preposterous

As if actual diseases weren't frightening enough, we now have what seems like a whole encyclopedia of 'pre-diseases' to fear.

 

According to Ivan Oransky, a medical doctor and editor of Reuters Health, everyone reading this article is suffering from the universally terminal condition called pre-death. This assumes, of course, that everyone reading this article is actually alive.

Although said with tongue firmly planted in cheek to an audience of health groupies at last week’s TEDMED conference in Washington, D.C., Oransky’s point is clear: The rush to label people with one medical condition or another – even if it’s a pre-condition – has gotten out of hand. 

“As if actual diseases weren't frightening enough,” writes The Atlantic’s Brian Fung in his review of Oransky’s talk, “we now have what seems like a whole encyclopedia of pre-diseases to fear” – everything from pre-hypertension and pre-diabetes to pre-anxiety and pre-dementia.

"I have another name for these preconditions," said Oransky. "I call them preposterous."

As new-school as the thought of being predestined for disease may sound, its roots are actually quite old-school.

Drawing on familiar Bible verses such as “Many are called, but few are chosen” (Matthew 22:14), sixteenth-century theologian John Calvin popularized the idea that only a select group of people will be saved and go to Heaven, while everyone else, regardless of piety, will suffer eternal damnation. As harmless as such notions may sound, there’s at least one documented case of someone becoming physically ill at the mere thought of such random selection. 

In her book, Retrospection and Introspection, nineteenth-century religious leader and medical reformer Mary Baker Eddy relates that, before being admitted as a young girl to the Congregational Church, she became “greatly troubled” by Calvin’s doctrine of predestination.

“I was unwilling to be saved, if my brothers and sisters were to be numbered among those who were doomed to perpetual banishment from God. So perturbed was I by the thoughts aroused by this erroneous doctrine, that the family doctor was summoned, and pronounced me stricken with fever.”

After praying for a short time – mentally exchanging the thought of eternal and perhaps inevitable damnation for a more inspired view of God’s eternal love – the fever lifted.

“The physician marveled; and the ‘horrible decree’ of predestination — as John Calvin rightly called his own tenet — forever lost its power over me.”

Although this may sound like an isolated, unrelated event, people like Dr. Oransky are beginning to question the effect that other, if less dire, prognoses like pre-hypertension and pre-diabetes are having on a society prone to seeking medical treatment that may actually do more harm than good. He cites the more than 100,000 people who die each year, not from the conditions they’re suffering from, but from the mostly drug-based remedies they require to manage these conditions.

Perhaps a more important question to ask is, if we’re all predisposed to disease in the first place. Is it possible that health might actually be our natural, terminal – maybe even eternal – condition? As crazy as that may sound, there’s no denying the fact that we’re seeing an increasing number of people these days living longer, healthier lives – many without the aid of medical intervention and, presumably, without the burden of unnecessary and unwarranted prediagnoses. 

Certainly, then, this remains a possibility for everyone reading this article.

 

Eric Nelson is a Los Altos resident. This article shared with permission by Communities @WashingtonTimes.com.


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Joan J. Strong May 22, 2013 at 11:21 am
Corrections: 1. Straw man attack: nobody is blaming BCS for district-wide growth. Nobody. 2. BCSRead More does not get "half the funding" of LASD. BCS gets about 6500 and LASD gets about 9500. The BCS program for typical children costs about twice as much as the comparable LASD program. BCS is simple an expensive hybrid public/private school, nothing more. 3. Mr. Roode pointed out that there are about 100 or so special ed. students at LASD (I cannot verify this but it seems very low). LASD calls out an annual expense of $7.5 million for special ed. meaning each of these students cost LASD $75,000, not $1,000 as he implied. 4. The law and the courts have ALREADY compelled LASD to give reasonably equivalent facilities and they have. BCS has a lower student/teacher ratio meaning that they have more classrooms for the same number of kids. This is not, legally speaking, LASD's problem. 5. Mr. Roode has yet to explain how the Covington campus could be 16 acres. Further, he continues to spread the fallacy that campuses ACREAGE is even remotely relevant to its student capacity. Campuses are limited by their location and traffic, not how many acres of grass there is in the back. 6. Were it not for BCS, we would have passed a bond in the last election, as the polling shows. BCS litigation has ripped our community apart and has left it with a mountain to climb when it comes to operating in a normal fashion.
L.A. Chung (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
@David R. I think Homestead uses EarthCare Recycling, based on its April 6 E-Waste collection dayRead More publicity (http://bit.ly/10mIV14) : www.earthcarerecycling.com "Recycle FREE your old electronic equipment - working or not! Anything with a plug or PC board inside. Also accepted are non-household batteries, VHS tapes and other media, and scrap metal. Visit www.earthcarerecycling.com for a list of accepted items. "
David R. May 21, 2013 at 10:26 pm
What kind of bins are there? Do you take used CDROMs? How about VHS tapes? Cables and wire?
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.