.
Feedback

Healthy Aging Begins With a Dose of Optimism

More than 75% of those aged 60-69 expects their health to stay the same or get better. Do these people know something that the rest of us don’t?

 

My friend calls them “organ recitals” – those all-too-frequent occasions when our conversations with one another end up being nothing more than a depressing recap of bodily aches and pains. Although by no means restricted to one age group or another, experience would suggest that they’re more commonly heard amongst the elderly.

As it turns out, though, this kind of gloomy chit chat belies the fact that most older Americans are actually quite optimistic about their future. Even about their health.

According to a survey conducted by USA Today, United Healthcare, and the National Council on Aging:

• More than 80% of those over 60 agree with the statement, “I have a strong sense of purpose and passion about my life and my future.”

• 92% report that they manage their stress levels well.

• 80% are confident in their ability to manage their health conditions on their own, reducing their need to see a doctor.

But perhaps most surprisingly, more than 75% of those aged 60 to 69 – and a majority of those 70 and older – expects their quality of life, including their mental and physical health, to stay the same or get better.

Get better? Conventional wisdom would say, either these folks have no idea what it means to get old or they’re on to something us younguns need to know about. What gives?

“When I called a couple of my favorite gerontologists to help me puzzle this out,” writes New York Times blogger Paula Span in her response to this survey, “they weren’t really surprised; social scientists have known for years that older people, freed from the midlife stresses of work and child rearing, become happier. They call it the U-shaped curve: life satisfaction is greatest in people’s youth and then again in old age.”

Although Span cites a number of variables that might have skewed the survey, she also acknowledges that, “older people are better able to regulate their emotions, to focus on sources of pleasure, to maintain equanimity.”

This ability to “maintain equanimity” is just one of many factors involved in reducing stress, which by itself accounts for anywhere between 60% and 90% of all doctor visits. It stands to reason then that someone who’s feeling less stressed-out might also feel – and justifiably so – that his or her health is holding steady, maybe even improving.

Of course, it’d be a shame if we had to wait to slip through life’s U-shaped curve before gaining the confidence that our health might actually improve over time. Isn’t there something we could be doing now, regardless of age?

For increasing numbers of people – old, young, and middle-aged – the ticket to living a healthier, stress-free life is meditation. Others, including myself, are finding that a prayer-based approach is what works best, relying less on the human mind to gain a sense of mental serenity and more on the stress-reducing, health-inducing assurances conveyed by the divine Mind.

“Let all that I am wait quietly before God [Mind],” it says in one of my favorite psalms, “for my hope is in him” (62:5).

Whether one’s expectation of improving health is a natural by-product of no longer having to deal with the stresses and strains of kids and work, or something a bit more spiritually grounded, the benefits are undeniable. As this fact becomes more widely known, perhaps we’ll have fewer organ recitals and more symphonies of health to look forward to in the future.

Eric Nelson is a Los Altos resident. His articles on the link between consciousness and health appear regularly in a number of local, regional, and national online publications, including The Washington Times. He also serves as the media and legislative spokesperson for Christian Science in Northern California. This article published with permission by Communities @WashingtonTimes.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Joan J. Strong May 22, 2013 at 11:21 am
Corrections: 1. Straw man attack: nobody is blaming BCS for district-wide growth. Nobody. 2. BCSRead More does not get "half the funding" of LASD. BCS gets about 6500 and LASD gets about 9500. The BCS program for typical children costs about twice as much as the comparable LASD program. BCS is simple an expensive hybrid public/private school, nothing more. 3. Mr. Roode pointed out that there are about 100 or so special ed. students at LASD (I cannot verify this but it seems very low). LASD calls out an annual expense of $7.5 million for special ed. meaning each of these students cost LASD $75,000, not $1,000 as he implied. 4. The law and the courts have ALREADY compelled LASD to give reasonably equivalent facilities and they have. BCS has a lower student/teacher ratio meaning that they have more classrooms for the same number of kids. This is not, legally speaking, LASD's problem. 5. Mr. Roode has yet to explain how the Covington campus could be 16 acres. Further, he continues to spread the fallacy that campuses ACREAGE is even remotely relevant to its student capacity. Campuses are limited by their location and traffic, not how many acres of grass there is in the back. 6. Were it not for BCS, we would have passed a bond in the last election, as the polling shows. BCS litigation has ripped our community apart and has left it with a mountain to climb when it comes to operating in a normal fashion.
L.A. Chung (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
@David R. I think Homestead uses EarthCare Recycling, based on its April 6 E-Waste collection dayRead More publicity (http://bit.ly/10mIV14) : www.earthcarerecycling.com "Recycle FREE your old electronic equipment - working or not! Anything with a plug or PC board inside. Also accepted are non-household batteries, VHS tapes and other media, and scrap metal. Visit www.earthcarerecycling.com for a list of accepted items. "
David R. May 21, 2013 at 10:26 pm
What kind of bins are there? Do you take used CDROMs? How about VHS tapes? Cables and wire?
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.