.
Feedback

Health & Medicine Conference Encourages Revolt

The revolution in health and medicine launched this week in Washington is just one of many such uprisings already in full swing.

 

Revolutions seem to be a dime-a-dozen these days.

But the uprising launched this week at the TEDMED medical conference in Washington, D.C. just might be the most far-reaching of them all, impacting in some way, shape, or form the vast majority of those living on planet Earth.

This wasn’t your typical coup d'état but a decidedly nonviolent revolt, instigated by a couple of unassuming poets. That’s right - poets.

From a program that included powerhouse speakers like Thomas Frieden of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Francis Collins from the National Institutes of Health – not to mention sports greats Gabby Reece, Laird Hamilton, and Billie Jean King – it’s likely that the lesser-known performance poets Sekou Andrews and Steve Connell will be the ones most responsible for setting this insurgency in motion.

Andrews and Connell began their TEDMED presentation by asking the audience, “Where do revolutionaries come from?” Drawing on examples as diverse as Jonas Salk, Martin Luther King Jr., and César Chavez, they emphasized the fact that revolutionaries aren’t some specially trained group of people, but simply those who are willing to stand their ground.

In other words, people just like you and me.

The hope is that at least a few of the 1,300-plus attendees – a “curated audience” representing 300 medical and nonmedical disciplines – will take this message to heart and feel empowered to release the revolutionary within.

While it’s hard to tell exactly which arenas of medicine are most ripe for revolt, we do know where significant uprisings are already in full swing.

Stanford University’s Dr. John Ioannidis began stirring things up when he started to question the credibility of many widely accepted medical studies. What he found is that as much as 90 percent of the published information relied on by doctors is flawed. Although there is some concern in the medical field about broadcasting these findings to a public prone to overreaction, Dr. Ioannidis is adamant.

“If we don’t tell the public about these problems, then we’re no better than nonscientists who falsely claim they can heal,” he said.

There’s also quite a bustle going on at Harvard University, where researchers from a broad range of backgrounds are examining the biological basis of the placebo response – the idea that the patient’s thought, more than any particular pill or procedure, affects the healing process.

But perhaps the most interesting – and promising – rebellion of all is the slow but certain shift away from looking at the body as a purely matter-based construct to a more enlightened view that takes into consideration the individual’s spirituality as well. Continue reading…

 

Eric Nelson is a Los Altos resident. This article shared with permission by Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com.


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.