.
Feedback

Eshoo Hails New Cancer Research Law

'Recalcitrant' cancers, such as pancreatic cancer that killed actor Patrick Swayze and Ambassador Richard Sklar, will receive more attention from the National Cancer Institute.

 

Flanked by the wife of the late actor and cancer victim Patrick Swayze Wednesday, Rep. Anna G. Eshoo celebrated the passage of a law that requires the federal government to fight harder against the most deadly cancers.

Eshoo, D-Palo Alto, co-sponsored the Recalcitrant Cancer Research Act, which was signed by President Barack Obama on Jan. 3.

The law directs the National Cancer Institute to focus on early detection and treatment of cancers with very low survival rates—including pancreatic cancer, which has the lowest survival rate of the five major cancers.

"A very dear friend of mine, Ambassador Richard Sklar, was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer," Eshoo said at a news conference at Stanford Hospital. "It really took a toll on us, and when I asked why I haven't heard from (victims) about this, he said, 'because they're all dead.'

Eshoo continued, "Pancreatic cancer is one of the recalcitrant cancers—one that is essentially a death sentence."

Julie Fleshman, president and CEO of the Manhattan Beach-based Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, applauded Eshoo's five-year effort and that of U.S. Representative Leonard Lance (R-NJ) and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI). “Today, we celebrate this important step, but we do so while honoring the memory of so many people whose lives were cut short by pancreatic cancer.”

The congresswoman said the law is meant to push such cancers to the front lines of research.

“My husband Patrick fought courageously against pancreatic cancer before passing away 22 months after his diagnosis,” said Lisa Niemi Swayze. “I know that Patrick would be proud, too, that he was a part of this fight, one that is going to change the outcome for so many future generations.”

According to Eshoo, pancreatic cancer has the lowest five-year survival rate of all the major cancers, at just 6 percent. Seventy-five percent of victims die within the first year of their diagnosis, she said.

“All cancer patients hope for cure, or at the very least, treatments to afford them longer quality filled time,” said Dr. George Fisher, Associate Professor of Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine, in a statement on U.S. Rep. Eshoo's news release about the new law. 

“When a cure is not available with standard treatments, they hope for  breakthroughs in research that may benefit them. This legislation will give our patients with the most difficult cancers a reason to hope for better outcomes by accelerating the science and focusing research efforts on those diseases with the greatest need for improvement.”

A one page fact sheet with information about pancreatic cancer can be found here.

 

—Copyright © 2013 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

Additional information came from U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo's office. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Altos Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
David R. May 20, 2013 at 01:18 pm
I saw a public report that said most of the discussion related to carpooling and so forth, sinceRead More Blach is separated so much from the rest of the school. You know, things like dropping off both kids at Egan, and then a group of kids headed for Blach share a ride or vice versa. I don't see how any nonparents can really help with that.
mtnview_parent April 12, 2013 at 03:06 am
The only problem with the charter school is that they cause more problem than they solve. TheyRead More want to close Covington, then Blach. So, they don't provide flexibility at all. They keep going to court. This is a case were the remedy is worst than the disease. The original idea is that we have to be creative with the 10th site. Land is scarce, and most likely, we cannot provide the same facility than other school within the district. People are not happy about being moved from their school (with good reason I feel) Solution: provide an inspiring project. May be an immersion program, or a more academic program, or maybe a program to help english learner from K-3. If we don't innovate with a more flexible program, we might just need to redraw the boundaries every 5-7 years. Nobody can foresee the future, but you can build flexibility.
Mitch Caldwell April 11, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Maybe offering a magnet school could help with stability? It can balance out enrollment at otherRead More schools so that attendance boundaries do not have to be redrawn. Isn't the charter school doing that for the LASD district right now?
mtnview_parent April 11, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I saw you had a good discussion on the definition of a neighborhood school. But beyond theRead More definitions, I would like to ask why does palo Alto school District and Cupertino School district have a mix of neighborhood school and some choice school. Those are two high performing district right next to us. Can a choice school be an excellent way to stop the highly disruptive attendance boundary change ? People say I am for statu quo, that I am against change. I feel that family and children need stability, that is why we don't change spouse at the pace the BoT change the attendance boundary. People who want some stability at home (and their school) do make a reasonable request.