Editor's note: The original version of this article had a misrepresentation of a speaker's comments regarding $97,000 spent. The money was spent on a restoration concept design.
The turnout at the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District July 18 meeting regarding the "cube" atop Mount Umunhum was large, and perhaps reflective of the growing support by members of the community who wish to the 85-foot radar tower that the district has proposed to demolish.
"This is going to be big," said Basim Jaber, Mt. Umunhum and Almaden Air Force Station historian. He was right.
Tipped off by and in The San Jose Mercury News and , and a petition by Jaber himself, the attendance at Cupertino's Quinlan Community Center was so massive that extra chairs had to be brought out to accommodate the number of visitors, twice. And still some could only stand.
"This turnout is very unusual for us," said Meredith Manning, the district's senior planner. "But we welcome it."
The cause, which drew so many from across the south bay, was to inform the district of the historical and cultural significance of Mt. Um's "cube."
"Of all the public comments, the radar tower provided the most content by far," Manning said.
Built to support an 85-ton spinning radar "sail", the cube is a lasting reminder of the role the Almaden station played in U.S. national defense during the Cold War. Established in 1958 by the U.S. Air Force, the Almaden station provided a radar umbrella 200 miles out over the Pacific Ocean looking for incoming Soviet nuclear bombers. The radar information gathered atop Mt. Umunhum was fed directly to NORAD by the largest computer system ever built, IBM's SAGE system.
The SAGE system could calculate an intercept course for detected bombers and immediately send that information to the NIKE missiles waiting throughout the bay. If the Cold War ever heated up, the men of the 682nd radar squadron who manned the Almaden station would be the first and only line of defense against nuclear war.
But besides presiding as a modern day watch-tower, Mt. Um's cube has significance outside of military veterans and historians.
"People say 'the military guys want to keep the tower but no one else cares,'" said one commenter, "that simply isn't true."
Another asked, "How many of us would be here if we were talking about Mount Thayer?"
Many more spoke of the history the tower shared with the valley, from its construction to its orientation power as a landmark.
Of the more than 40 people who spoke to the district's board members, many were not from the military and spoke of the cube as something that was uniquely theirs, despite resting on land owned by the district.
"You know you're home when you can see that tower," said one commenter. "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and I think the cube is beautiful," said another.
Speakers reminded the district's board about how important the iconic land mark was to inspiring curiosity about the cube itself and Mt. Um's history both militarily and in the lives of the Ohlone people.
That is not to say that everyone who spoke to the board wanted to keep the tower, just the majority of them.
"This is a monstrosity," said Cathy Helgerson of Cupertino. "We can't afford to pay for our kids' education, but we can afford this?!" Another speaker said he would feel as though he were in downtown San Jose if he were standing next to the cube, and wanted to enjoy a panoramic view of the bay on top of the mountain.
The intact structure has also been described by valley residents as "an eyesore" upon the mountain ridge. Yet, others pointed out that the flattened mountain top the cube sits upon, that the district has no intention of restoring, stands out more.
For the majority of the people attending the Wednesday meeting, the answer was clear: keep the tower.
Some even proposed new options for the tower, from turning it into a museum or visitor's center to gutting the building to save on costs. Hella Bluhm-Stieber of San Jose voiced her son's, perhaps facetious, suggestion to install a climbing wall on the tower's sides (in light of the district's plan to erect a hang-glider's hut, possibly not far fetched.).
One could be forgiven for thinking that the future of Mt. Umunhum hung in the balance Wednesday night. In actuality, the fate of the mountain top's concrete monolith will be decided by the district's elected board, later in the year during a fall meeting that has yet to be scheduled. Wednesday's meeting was to decide upon the criteria that would be considered when making the final decision to either keep the tower, destroy the tower or keep only the first floor of the tower.
The criteria the district will consider when making their decision on the tower are as follows:
A: Refers to the Board-adopted polices, including the Mission Statement, the Basic Policy and the Policies Regarding Improvements on District Lands.
B: Is the structure under consideration believed to be compatible with and/or add to the character of the site and surrounding landscape?
C: Does the structure have historic, cultural or architectural significance at the national, state or local level?
D: Does the opportunity exist to partner with other agencies, community organizations and individuals to retain and/or manage the structure?
E: What financial cost commitment is necessary, both short- and long-term, to upgrade and manage the structure to provide for safe public enjoyment?
F: What beneficial and reasonable uses could the structure support?
G: What feedback has been received from the public regarding the structure?
H: How will action taken on the structure impact other District priorities?
I: Does the structure add value to, or detract from, the visitor experience, whether up close or at a distance?
Of course, there is a cost associated with keeping the tower, almost $2 million to be exact.
During the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake the radar tower suffered "significant" damage, according to Bret Lizundia, one of the consultants for the district.
The cube has 38 percent less capacity as a result of the quake, Lizundia said. "This puts you over a trigger, which is 20 percent, and California building code requires repair."
In addition to new paint, a new roof and the sealing of windows, doors and cracks in the building, not to mention the maintenance for the next 20 years, the cost to the district for keeping the building is estimated at three times the cost of destroying it.
With a total site clean up estimated at just shy of the $13 million provided to restore the mountain top, the district isn't exactly flush with cash.
Not everyone trusts the current cost estimates.
Jaber said he believed the district was inflating costs, a view echoed by another speaker who said it cost $97,000 for the restoration design group to create mockups, easel artwork, conceptual design and a paper model.
"Something about the costs struck me as odd" when presented with the $1.8 million price tag for keeping the tower, a speaker said.
Perhaps the conflict at the heart of this situation can be explained simply by the written comments the district allowed to be publicly submitted.
"Destroying the tower would be vandalism," wrote one commenter. "But leaving it up would generate vandalism," was its response.
Further information about the Mt. Umunhum project can be found on the district's website, http://www.openspace.org/plans_projects/mt_umunhum.asp